So, it’s December 12th 2016 and the official Iron Crown website has been down for 3+ days, stalling a number of thread discussions on RMU development. This momentary pause got me to thinking. Rolemaster has always been criticized for being “chart heavy” but with RMU and a few tweaks, most of the charts can be eliminated. My own house rules have already done a lot of simplification but even a quick review of RMU indicates that most charts are illustrative and not really needed during gameplay. In overview:
- Character Generation. There are charts needed for character creation: stat bonuses, skill rank bonuses, equipment etc. But these are used initially or when leveling up, not for general game play.
- “Cool” charts. As Peter discussed in an earlier blog—individual weapon and critical charts are really the unique differentiation for RM. Those really are the heart of the system.
- RR’s. The RR chart is almost intuitive and could be tweaked so that RR’s can be quickly calculated without a chart.
- Consolidating most mechanisms into a d100 “unified maneuver scale” framework eliminates most of the charts and streamlines the system. RMU has done quite a bit of this but there are still “one-off” rules that have a separate resolution process. Basically the unified maneuver scale is: 0-25 Absolute Failure, 26-75 Failure, 76 Partial Failure/Success and 100+ success. This scale can be applied to RR’s, MM, SM, fatigue, breakage and skill checks. In reality, No chart is needed for almost all Rolemaster action resolutions.
- Simplifying armor penalties and encumbrance eliminates a number of charts and calculations. I have blogged about removing the Maneuvering in Armor skill and consolidating it into encumbrance here. It’s also been discussed on the RM Forums. This step takes away quite a bit of charts, calculations and unnecessary complexity.
- Eliminate name tags. Qualitative titles like “Easy”, “Hard” “Absurd” or “Small”, “Very Large” or “Quick”, “Blinding Fast” impart general information but are really just placeholders for a numeric value. They may add atmosphere but all require a quick look up on a chart to translate into their game mechanic or modifier. By eliminating the name tag you eliminate a number of charts. For instance, when describing a lock door in a module is it easier to say (-30 to pick) or (Medium to pick)? I have blogged about this here.
- Master Mod Chart. All the environmental, melee, combat maneuvers and health modifiers could be reduced to a single 1 page chart. The same could be done for all the magical mods. The GM screen would be simplified and streamlined.
So let’s go through the charts and see what could be eliminated. (Using RMU CORE 2014 March 15)
2-1. Skill Ranks. A small simple chart that is only used for char gen and level ups. It’s also easy to remember. Result – Chart barely needed.
2-2 Maneuvers. The failure/success ranges are intuitive that there is really no need to refer to a chart. Difficulty name tags (casual, routine etc) can be eliminated and a simple range of -100 to +100 applied by the GM (btw this actually provides more range of difficulty for the GM to implement than the pre-set difficulty levels). Light and pain mods can be included in a master modifier chart (with melee mods). Other modifiers are mostly encumbrance related and don’t need a chart. So basically 9/10ths of this chart can be eliminated or simplified or doesn’t need to be referenced during game play. Result – Chart eliminated.
2-3 Movement. Name tags (creep, walk etc) can be eliminated and just use pace multiples of ½ to 5x. As Hurin suggested in a RM Forum thread, a simple penalty per pace multiple can be set. In addition, the encumbrance penalty can be applied to MM and to the total rate itself. Result – Chart eliminated.
2-4. Sizes. A useful reference tool but once a size is applied to a creature than it is not necessary. Eliminated the name tags (Tiny, Small, Huge etc) and just using the size # (I-X) makes size calculations easier (see next table). Result – Chart only used as reference to assign a size to a creature.
2-5 Attack Size. I proposed a simpler size adjustment system: 1/X or X/1 per size difference and +1/-1 to critical results per size difference. Simple and easy. It’s the system I’m using with Beta 2 although there were some changes to the combat tables in RMU Beta 3 that might skew results. Result – Chart eliminated.
2-6 High Criticals. This info could be included on each weapon table so it’s easily referenced when determining attack results. With the new chart design there is room on each page. Result – Chart incl. in each weapon table eliminates separate look-up.
2-7 Hit Loss Penalty. This small chart could be rolled into the master modifier chart (with melee mods and lighting etc) or a GM could just apply a penalty equal to hit loss (rounded to nearest 10%). Result – Chart consolidated or eliminated.
2-8. Resistance Roll. Stat RR’s can be included in the stat section and the failure results can use the unified maneuver scale. Result – Chart eliminated.
3-1. Races. Needed for char gen. Result – Chart needed for reference.
3-2 Race Sizes. Rather than apply a name tag: “S”, “M” or “L” skip to the actual “numerical size”: III, IV or V. The remainder is just char gen reference. Result – Chart simplified and used for reference.3-2
3-3 Cultures. Chart used for char gen only.
3-4 Profession Spell Costs. Chart used for char gen and level up only. In our NO Profession rules we’ve eliminated this chart and apply a standard 5* cost to all skills. Chart used for char gen and lvl advance only
3-5 Stat Bonuses. Chart used for char gen and stat gain only.
3-6 Stat Gain. We eliminated this chart and just use DP’s to advance stats. However, RAW, this is only used on level advance. Chart used for stat gain only
4-1 Skill Summary. Reference only. Not needed in game play.
4-2. Skill Similarity. Simple enough that you don’t need to refer to it. Include in GM screen or eliminate it at GM’s discretion of skill use.
4-3. Animal Maneuvers. I’m not a fan of a separate modifier chart for every single skill. Some basic guidelines on difficulty modifiers would be my choice. Chart used at GM discretion.
4-4 through 4-9, 4-11, 4-12, 4-14, 4-15, 4-16, 4-17 These are a perfect example of chart bloat and adds to the perception of “Chartmaster”. These should be eliminated and used as presented with the unified maneuver scale. Perhaps some examples of what a “failure” or “partial success” could be included in the skill description but results really depend on context and situation. Charts redundant and should be eliminated.
4-10. Knowledge Tier. Useful and ties the skill/lore system together as discussed here.
4-13. Channeling Modifiers. Small chart can be included in nFUX master modifier chart. Chart consolidated into master magic mod chart.
4-16. Driving Maneuvers. Again this seems like “Animal Maneuvers”. Unneeded complexity, lots of modifiers for a single skill. Chart should be simplified or eliminated or moved to optional rules or companion.
5-* Tables. Talents should be optional rules but are not needed for regular gameplay. Optional
6-1 Coinage Standards. Basic reference. Keep
6-2 Starting Money. Only used at char gen. Keep.
6-3. Equipment Breakage. Should be further simplified into unified maneuver scale. Eliminate chart.
6-4 Equipment Repair. Should be simplified into unified maneuver scale. Eliminate chart.
6-5 General Equipment. Reference chart. Keep
6-6 Armor Chart. Reference chart. Keep.
6-7 Weapons. Reference Chart. Keep & expand. We’ve proposed shifting various combat maneuvers into weapon specific mods. Shouldn’t the reverse strike penalty be different between a dagger and a polearm? Chart should be expanded into weapon specific modifiers.
7-1 Action Points Action. I think there are currently changes being made to the initiative and round resolution system. In development?
7-2 Charging. This could be simplified. For instance, the size category can increase by +1/pace X. Pace modifier would still apply. Chart eliminated!
7-3 Attack Roll. This could morph into the master modifier chart to include the handful of useful modifiers in previous tables (lighting, terrain, position etc). Included in master mod chart.
7-4. Disarm Maneuver. Lots of rules for one skill. Personally I think disarm should just be a standard result in the critical roll or purely a maneuver resolution separate from melee actions. Disarm, dodge, ambush are problematic powerful skills with complicated rule resolution. Work needs to be done.
7-5 Katas. These rules may need some work but there are only a few mods in a small chart. Include in master modifier chart.
7-6 Protect. Include in master modifier chart or review for simplification. It seems that this should only work if the Protector is at the flank of the defender. Move protect mods into individual weapon chart.
7-7. Slaying. It makes more sense to just have Slaying bump up the severity and not add to the crit roll. Thus the chart would be eliminated.
7-8 Subdual. Roll into master modifier chart and/or use individual weapon modifiers. Chart eliminated.
8-1 Armor Flexibility.. Delete and/or incorporate into 8-2.
8-2 Armor Type. Reference Keep.
8-3 Shields. Keep or incorporate into equipment/armor table 6-6.
8-4 Piecemeal Armor. Confusing—simplify into table 6-6.
11-1 Power Level. Optional but should be expanded to include other mechanisms to adjust (equipment, DP’s etc). Move to optional rules or companion.
11-2 Levels. Confusing? Needed? Eliminate.
11-3 Starting Money. Only for char gen. Expand into larger random table? Keep.
12-1. Endurance. Use unified maneuver scale. Eliminate. The few mods could be included in the master mod chart.
12-2. Injuries and Recovery. Simplify?
12-4 & 12-5 & 12-6 Cauterization and Defibrillation & Decomp. Too complex, granular. Move to Optional rules?
13-1 Biomes. Useful as reference. Keep.
13-2 Extreme Temps. ? Optional rules.
13-3 & 13-4 & 13.5. Fright & Morale & Rally Consolidate and use unified maneuver scale.
13-6. Feats of Strength. Simply with an intuitive conversion of weight to weight. Eliminate chart.
13-7. Poisons & 13-8 Diseases This is something that needs to be simplified for game play. Perhaps create 1 affect/poison or disease and use the unified maneuver role scale.
13-8. Lighting. Eliminate and incorporate into master mod chart.
You’ll note that most RMU skill charts do follow the Failure/Failure/Partial/Success unified maneuver scale—but many skills have their own chart. That adds to the perception that RM has too many lookup charts for gameplay. Rather than include a chart for various skills, some simple guidelines on what a “partial success” or “partial failure” may look like to help a GM.
All in all, the total modifiers for environment, health and melee situations can be distilled into 1 master table. All the spell casting and magic mods could be distilled into another chart: 2 pages total. The few remaining charts are either reference, optional or used only at character gen or leveling up. You still have individual weapon attack charts, fumbles and crits but that’s what people love about RM. Everything else can fall under easy to remember, intuitive or quantifiable labels to ease gameplay. All the mods can be consolidated into 2 master tables. In other words, a unified rule system.
2 thoughts on ““Chartmaster” or “ChartLESSmaster”? Simplifying Rolemaster is Simple!”
I personally do not think that highly detailed character generation is a problem and you can use as many charts as you like. The more detailed the character the better. Sure it can take an entire game session to create a party but those characters will hopefully embody the players vision of the character they wanted to play.
I would suggest that any new release of Rolemaster has a number of pregen characters built in and all RMU adventures come with a number of pregen characters. If a completely new players experience of Rolemaster is 3hrs of crawling though character generation then they will probably assume that the rest of the game is the same. Pregens will eliminate that so new players learn how the game plays before they have to learn how to create a character.
I have eliminated the named difficulties levels because I could never remember the exact relationship between label and value pairs and I frankly could not be arsed to look them up. I just assign a penalty that I think is suitable.
Making each page of unique weapon tables do more work is a great idea and is my preferred format but there is a potential problem with that. In my combat tables there are bow themed criticals, sword themed criticals and so on with arms law a broadsword could do one of 100 possible slash criticals, 100 crushes and even a smattering of puncture criticals. You cannot get all of them on a single page.
I know that with the 24 possible sword criticals that they come around too frequently if everyone in a combat is using the same weapon. I have make alternative versions of the most common pages I use so you get the official criticals on Friday night games and my revised criticals on Satuday. That gives more variety and addresses the issue but it does not all fit on a single page.